<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Contractor AdvisorContractor Advisor | Contractor Advisor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contractoradvisor.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contractoradvisor.co.uk</link>
	<description>The online resource for UK Contractors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:29:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on IR35 and AWR &#8211; separated at birth? by How to make your contracts IR35-proof - Guides advice from Freelance Advisor</title>
		<link>http://www.contractoradvisor.co.uk/news/ir35-and-awr-separated-at-birth/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>How to make your contracts IR35-proof - Guides advice from Freelance Advisor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contractoradvisor.co.uk/?p=815#comment-253</guid>
		<description>[...] using Umbrella Companies) will be afforded the same benefits as permanent employees &#8211; the relationship between AWR and IR35 has yet to be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] using Umbrella Companies) will be afforded the same benefits as permanent employees &#8211; the relationship between AWR and IR35 has yet to be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IR35: What is &#8220;Mutuality of Obligation&#8221;? by How to make your contracts IR35-proof - Guides advice from Freelance Advisor</title>
		<link>http://www.contractoradvisor.co.uk/guides/ir35-what-is-mutuality-of-obligation/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>How to make your contracts IR35-proof - Guides advice from Freelance Advisor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contractoradvisor.co.uk/?p=67#comment-252</guid>
		<description>[...] obligation to offer you more work and you have no obligation to take it (This is what is meant by Mutuality of Obligation). Provisions to extend the contract should be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] obligation to offer you more work and you have no obligation to take it (This is what is meant by Mutuality of Obligation). Provisions to extend the contract should be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Contractor Advisor IR35 Guide by Agency Workers Regulations &#124; AWR &#124; Umbrella Company &#124; AWR Guide - Guides advice from Freelance Advisor</title>
		<link>http://www.contractoradvisor.co.uk/ir35/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Agency Workers Regulations &#124; AWR &#124; Umbrella Company &#124; AWR Guide - Guides advice from Freelance Advisor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contractoradvisor.co.uk/#comment-251</guid>
		<description>[...] include LCC&#8217;s.  It is believed, although not yet tested, that if an LCC falls outside of IR35 they it should fall outside of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] include LCC&#8217;s.  It is believed, although not yet tested, that if an LCC falls outside of IR35 they it should fall outside of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Government IR35 pay deals raise spectre of contractor witch-hunt by PCG launch campaign defending limited company freelancers - News advice from Freelance Advisor</title>
		<link>http://www.contractoradvisor.co.uk/news/government-ir35-pay-deals-raise-spectre-of-contractor-witch-hunt/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>PCG launch campaign defending limited company freelancers - News advice from Freelance Advisor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 13:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contractoradvisor.co.uk/?p=1009#comment-249</guid>
		<description>[...] For many freelancers &#8211; around 60% according to our own research &#8211; a limited company is a legitimate way to limit your personal liability, operate more tax-efficiently and make yourself more attractive to prospective employers. However, the recent controversy surrounding the inappropriate use of personal service companies by high-level public sector employees has threatened to undermine their legitimate use, and raised worries about a freelancer and contractor witch-hunt. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For many freelancers &#8211; around 60% according to our own research &#8211; a limited company is a legitimate way to limit your personal liability, operate more tax-efficiently and make yourself more attractive to prospective employers. However, the recent controversy surrounding the inappropriate use of personal service companies by high-level public sector employees has threatened to undermine their legitimate use, and raised worries about a freelancer and contractor witch-hunt. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Contractor Advisor IR35 Guide by Government IR35 pay deals raise spectre of contractor witch-hunt &#124; Contractor Advisor</title>
		<link>http://www.contractoradvisor.co.uk/ir35/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Government IR35 pay deals raise spectre of contractor witch-hunt &#124; Contractor Advisor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contractoradvisor.co.uk/#comment-245</guid>
		<description>[...] Government IR35 pay deals raise spectre of contractor witch-hunt by Jon Norris on Feb 21, 2012 &#8226; 11:00 am No Comments The contractor and freelancer world have been all atwitter these past few weeks after it was revealed that Student Loans Company Chief Executive Ed Lester received his pay through a limited company despite being an obvious employee of the firm. This is in stark contrast to HMRC&#8217;s stance on so-called disguised employment &#8211; which contractors and freelancers will know all-too-well in the form of IR35. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Government IR35 pay deals raise spectre of contractor witch-hunt by Jon Norris on Feb 21, 2012 &bull; 11:00 am No Comments The contractor and freelancer world have been all atwitter these past few weeks after it was revealed that Student Loans Company Chief Executive Ed Lester received his pay through a limited company despite being an obvious employee of the firm. This is in stark contrast to HMRC&#8217;s stance on so-called disguised employment &#8211; which contractors and freelancers will know all-too-well in the form of IR35. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Project Merlin banks claim to be on target for lending figures by Bank lending to freelancers and SMEs continues to fall - Money advice from Freelance Advisor</title>
		<link>http://www.contractoradvisor.co.uk/money/project-merlin-banks-claim-to-be-on-target-for-lending-figures/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Bank lending to freelancers and SMEs continues to fall - Money advice from Freelance Advisor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contractoradvisor.co.uk/?p=926#comment-244</guid>
		<description>[...] Project Merlin, the Government&#8217;s scheme to encourage the UK&#8217;s biggest banks to lend money to freelancers and small businesses, has proven something of a lame duck. The banks involved, Barclays, Lloyds, RBS and HSBC, agreed to set aside £190 billion for business lending throughout 2011, with £76 billion specifically earmarked for small business. The banks missed their targets in the first quarter, but subsequently recovered somewhat. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Project Merlin, the Government&#8217;s scheme to encourage the UK&#8217;s biggest banks to lend money to freelancers and small businesses, has proven something of a lame duck. The banks involved, Barclays, Lloyds, RBS and HSBC, agreed to set aside £190 billion for business lending throughout 2011, with £76 billion specifically earmarked for small business. The banks missed their targets in the first quarter, but subsequently recovered somewhat. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Banks on course to miss small business lending targets by Bank lending to freelancers and SMEs continues to fall - Money advice from Freelance Advisor</title>
		<link>http://www.contractoradvisor.co.uk/money/banks-on-course-to-miss-small-business-lending-targets/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Bank lending to freelancers and SMEs continues to fall - Money advice from Freelance Advisor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contractoradvisor.co.uk/?p=678#comment-240</guid>
		<description>[...] lending throughout 2011, with £76 billion specifically earmarked for small business. The banks missed their targets in the first quarter, but subsequently recovered [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lending throughout 2011, with £76 billion specifically earmarked for small business. The banks missed their targets in the first quarter, but subsequently recovered [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What we learned about IR35 in 2011 by Will Student Loans head face an IR35 investigation? - Money advice from Freelance Advisor</title>
		<link>http://www.contractoradvisor.co.uk/news/what-we-learned-about-ir35-in-2011/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Student Loans head face an IR35 investigation? - Money advice from Freelance Advisor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contractoradvisor.co.uk/?p=969#comment-239</guid>
		<description>[...] and contractors of the UK &#8211; not least because it is so opaque. We recently covered all the IR35 twists and turns in 2011, and now we bring you news of 2012&#8242;s first IR35 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and contractors of the UK &#8211; not least because it is so opaque. We recently covered all the IR35 twists and turns in 2011, and now we bring you news of 2012&#8242;s first IR35 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Contractor Advisor IR35 Guide by Libertarian think-tank proposes making SME employees self-employed &#124; Contractor Advisor</title>
		<link>http://www.contractoradvisor.co.uk/ir35/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Libertarian think-tank proposes making SME employees self-employed &#124; Contractor Advisor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contractoradvisor.co.uk/#comment-237</guid>
		<description>[...] and National Insurance Contributions. As this is exactly the situation HMRC is trying to avoid with IR35, we&#8217;re going to assume the proposal will be given short shrift at the top levels of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and National Insurance Contributions. As this is exactly the situation HMRC is trying to avoid with IR35, we&#8217;re going to assume the proposal will be given short shrift at the top levels of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on IR35: Direction &amp; Control by Can a company website influence your IR35 status? - Legal advice from Freelance Advisor</title>
		<link>http://www.contractoradvisor.co.uk/guides/ir35-direction-control/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Can a company website influence your IR35 status? - Legal advice from Freelance Advisor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contractoradvisor.co.uk/?p=432#comment-235</guid>
		<description>[...] as a way to help your cause in an IR35 status dispute, although in theory it could fall under the Direction and Control IR35 tests &#8211; if a worker is an employee, they wouldn&#8217;t have a website &#8211; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as a way to help your cause in an IR35 status dispute, although in theory it could fall under the Direction and Control IR35 tests &#8211; if a worker is an employee, they wouldn&#8217;t have a website &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

